A: If you've read through this website and are feeling uncertain... Well, what was it that kept you reading? The door is open every week - why not come take a look. There's no sales funnel; you can float as close or far as feels comfortable for you.
A: Well then, count that as a success - you learned something about yourself! Your arrival, learning, and departure will all be celebrated with acceptance and equanimity. The group exists for the sake of people, not the other way around.
A: No, membership is completely free.
A: Eh, pocket change so far. It's quite early still, and yes we'll have to figure out money and infrastructure at some point but we hope to avoid ever needing to create a financial barrier to entry.
A: Probably not, but we haven't ruled it out. 1pm Pacific / 4pm Eastern is meant to be feasible from New Zealand to Western Europe and Africa.
A: A little yes, mainly no. Obviously the pandemic did a lot to spread and normalize the use of video calls - but this is online intentionally and will stay that way at its core, even if we extend ourselves into some future physical activities in high-density locales.
A: No, sorry, and we don't see having one in our near future. We'd like to find and recommend some similar communities - please let us know if you have candidates.
A: We've stayed small and fairly quiet in Q1 and Q2, looking for that first handful of passionate co-creators. 60 total orientations, 40 at-least-once attendees, and any given Sunday has been in the 6-12 range. We'll probably cap Q3 at no more than about 25, should it come to that. We do intend to grow over time, but resist pursuing growth for the sake of status value
A: Saving the world is in fact an explicit non-goal of ours. Now, that isn't to say we're against that outcome - we'd like nothing more than for humanity to raise its collective consciousness, solve its hard coordination problems, and rise to meet and defeat the existential risks and challenges facing us as a species. However, we're well aware that "the world" is a really really really complex system that is usually quite resistant to white-knight savior-complex change efforts, so we think the best net effects probably come from not trying at all, or at least in any direct way.
A: Regardless of our global future, you care about the quality of your own life. You care about your family and friends, and likely for some communities you're in and the localities around you. Maybe we can do some small things, maybe we can have some bigger impacts, and maybe we can find ways to weave our efforts together at some scale we can't even picture right now. We really don't know: Maybe the best way for Intentional Society to *do*, as an organization, is to focus on *being* together, or to hold an open space for members to self-organize independent projects... we look forward to finding out.
A: James here: People have mostly been too polite to ask this question, but it's a very important one so here it is anyway. I do "hold the keys" currently - intentionally, as I try to balance sharing my calling intention with holding space for co-creation. As we grow, I intend to dilute my control over time until legal ownership and practical governance are both in the hands of the community.
A: We're using some Sociocratic governance practices, with some "Teal" (Reinventing Organizations by Laloux) and "Deliberately Developmental" (An Everyone Culture by Kegan & Lahey) underpinnings, if those terms mean anything to you. In plain language, we run on "consent of the impacted" with "power to all", aiming for agility and effectiveness without the stifling command-and-control culture of most organizations. Some governance decisions show up in the "meta time" of our general sessions, and further coordination happens within our Discord server.
A: It's not formally anything yet, but this looks quite probable in the near-to-medium-term future. There seems like a core not-for-profit organizational mission that would benefit from that legal designation, independent of any other ventures that arise.
A: Right now, honestly, yes, more than we'd like. It's absolutely true that the people most able to dedicate time and energy toward something like this are those who have all their basic needs fulfilled such that they can have the mental space and slack to invest in further self-development. This is in tension with our desire to be accessible and inclusive, and is a tension we must hold in our awareness as our capacities grow.
A: So many dominos *could* tip, one after the other, larger and larger: Personal transformation, self-authoring, and self-actualization left and right. Diverse Dunbar-scale communities of high trust, mutual support, and capacity to serve. A network of virtual communities with emergent cooperation and a meta-tribe with shared goals and non-naive reciprocal trust. A thriving start-up ecosystem of internal and external services owned as member co-ops. Organizing physical communities in new and existing cities to extend development across more socioeconomic strata. Political projects to raise governmental competence supported by a large virtual society. Personal development norms and expectations rising in nations and societies around the globe. But. Everything we do at every point - every stage along the way - must be worth it for its own sake. If any of this is just a stepping stone to greatness and glory, then we will have fallen right back into the "save the world" trap.
A: James here: Speaking for myself, all of this is one no-regrets move after another. Either I learn some valuable lessons while making some friends along the way, or we find that something fantastic emerges. There's nothing else I'd rather dance with for the next 40 years, and even the first six months has been so richly rewarding.
Have more questions? Bring them to an orientation call!